|
At Issue Index Table of Contents Previous Next |
|
150 Appendix C
What follows is an explanatory note from William Fagal, director of the White Estate Branch Office in Berrien Springs, Michigan. It was released on January 27, 1994. Revised Notice Regarding Kellogg Letter This letter was found recently in the document files
at the Ellen G. White Estate in Silver Spring. At the time of its
original typing in 1903 it was given a reference number, as was done
with Ellen White's letters, but evidently it never was actually entered
into her letter file, because another letter in that file bears the same
number. This may account for the fact that it has been overlooked for so
long: anyone finding the letter in the document file would assume it was
also in the letter file. Only when a White Estate staff member actually
cross-checked recently was the discovery made that it was not included
in the letter file. 151 "fallen human nature" to Jesus (without, of
course, saying that He ever committed sin). Since this matter has been
the subject of substantial controversy in the church, I felt we now had
a basis for resolving the controversy. But I had not paid attention to
Ellen White's own handwritten additions. Just before the phrase in
question, a caret (^) indicates that the words written above were to be
inserted. The statement then would read "Coming, as He did, as a
man, to meet and be subjected to with [Fagal
edited out "with"] all the evil
tendencies to which man is heir, He made it
possible for Himself to be buffeted by human agencies inspired by Satan,
the rebel who had been expelled from heaven" (italics mine).
(Another handwritten addition, "working in every conceivable manner
to destroy his faith," also needs to go into this sentence. By its
position it appears to go after "heir.") Unlike my first
reading, this reading is open to the interpretation that the evil
tendencies are external to
Christ in the Satan inspired people who will oppose, buffet, and oppress
Him. Though many will still read the statement in harmony with my first
reading, others will come to the alternative interpretation. I now think
that this statement will not resolve the controversy in the church. |