Page 171
APPENDIXES
Part A
Part B
In his books published in 1889 and 1919 D. M Canright attacks the doctrinal structure of Seventh-day Adventists. He also attacks Ellen G. White, who with her husband was
closely connected with the development of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.
What Canright as an experienced and responsible Seventh-day Adventist leader wrote
relative to the church and to Elder and Mrs. White makes interesting and profitable
reading. His calm, logical presentation based on his personal knowledge stands in
bold contrast to his erratic and at times irresponsible declarations made after severing
his connections with the church. In 1877 he presented in the Review and Herald,
between March 15 and June 14, a series of ten enlightening articles.
Under the title "A Plain Talk to the MurmurersSome Facts for Those Who Are
not in Harmony with the Body," he discusses at length the inception of the
Seventh-day Adventist Church and its early leadership and the value of the visions.
He then reviews the experience of individuals and groups who, because of dissatisfaction
with the organization of the church, its leaders, and the visions, had withdrawn and
attempted to start paralleling religious groups. The reading is informative and
profitable, and provides a mass of data not easily found elsewhere, but too extended to
include in its entirety here. We have selected for publication portions relating to
certain initial steps in church organization and Canright's remarks concerning James and
Ellen White. In this he presents his firsthand knowledge, and this after having
suffered certain setbacks in his own personal experience.
Then in 1885 Canright wrote again for the "Review" in somewhat the same
vein, but with a deeper significance because of his own experience of questionings and
doubts. The single 1885 article is reproduced in full under the original title,
"To Those in Doubting Castle." Excerpts from the first ten-article series,
and the full article just referred to, follow.
THE PUBLISHERS
Page 172
PART A
A Plain Talk to the MurmurersSome Facts for Those Who are not in Harmony with the Body
By D. M. CANRIGHT
DEAR BRETHREN AND SISTERS: It is a sad, but well known fact, that during the whole
history of this message from the first to the last, there have arisen here and there, now
and then, among our own brethren and sisters, those who have taken occasion to murmur and
complain, and find fault with various things in the work. Quite generally this
murmuring has centered upon Bro. and Sr. White, or their labors in some way.
Several times even little parties of these disaffected ones have been formed in
opposition to the body, and have drawn off by themselves. Others have not dared to
go quite so far as that, but still they have not really felt satisfied, and now and then
they show their dissatisfaction, though nominally remaining in harmony with the
body. With such persons particularly, I now wish to have this plain talk.
Come, let us reason together.
As you know, for the past dozen years or more, I have had an extensive
acquaintance with every part of this work. I have traveled and labored in every
State [sic] where we have churches, from Maine to California, from Texas to
Minnesota. Have visited a large share of our churches, and known the most of our
brethren personally. Especially have I been very familiarly acquainted with Bro. and
Sr. White, both at home and in their labors. Furthermore, I am well acquainted with
the most of those who have drawn off from us; have heard over and over, a thousand times,
all the difficulties and objections and grievances which trouble these brethren so
greatly.
Now I do not propose to start out by saying that there is no possible chance for
such difficulties or objections to be raised. No; if this were so, it would be a new
thing in the work of God. The Lord has never had a special work to do upon the
earth, but that there was plenty of chance for men to doubt, and get into trial, and lose
their faith in the work. Was it not so in the case of Moses? Of Nehemiah? Of Christ
himself? Of Martin Luther? If men are disposed to give more weight to a grain of sand than
they are to a mountain, then they will always have plenty of things about which to get
into trouble. This has always been so. What reason have we to expect that it
will be different now?
Page 173
SOME ARE SINCERELY TROUBLED
We are willing to assume, then, for the present, that the objections and difficulties
which trouble you so greatly are real to you, and that you hold them honestly.
Sometimes in the past, I myself have been troubled with these same things, and I have come
near stumbling over them; but I am thankful to say, that after years of careful
investigation, and a more thorough acquaintance with the work, these things are now all
very clear and satisfactory to my own mind, so much so, that it seems to me that, with a
fair chance, I can make any believer in the message see it.
Come, now, let us reason together. Certainly there are many great and
fundamental pillars of our faith upon which we all agree. Let us name some of them.
1. We do all firmly believe, that we are now in the last days, even in the last
generation. The fulfillment of numerous lines of prophecy and special signs of the
second advent are so clear that we are compelled to believe this.
2. The Lord designs that the world shall have a solemn warning with regard to the
second advent, the same as he has sent to the world on other and similar occasions, such
as the flood, the fall of Sodom, the overthrow of Nineveh, and the first advent of our
Saviour. Then, as Seventh-day Adventists, we all believe, and have good reasons for
believing, that the time has come for the third angel's message to be given to the
world. Rev. 14:9-16. This is the most awfully solemn message in the
Bible. It is to be the last to a fallen world. It is to ripen the harvest of
the earth. It is to prepare a people for translation. It is to prepare the wicked
for the seven last plagues. It calls for a reformation.
God's people are now scattered hither and thither through a multitude of different
sects, bred in error and breaking the commandments of God. 2 Tim. 3:1-5; Rev.
18:1-4. Just before the burning day of wrath, there will be a solemn message to gather
God's scattered people, unite them in one faith, that they may be hid in the time of
trouble. Zeph. 2:1-3. This last message is to be sounded to every nation, and
even before kings. Rev. 10:11.
GOD'S PLAN CALLS FOR LEADERS
Now I call your special attention to the following propositions:
Whenever God has had a special work to do in the earth, he has always selected
some one to begin that work, carry it on, and bring it to a successful termination.
This proposition is based upon a well known and universally acknowledged fact; viz., that
any important work, to be successful, must have a leader with recognized authority and
proper ability. Even in the smallest affairs of life, where many persons are
interested in the same thing, we all find it necessary to have some recognized authority
and head, so that all may act in union.
Even in so small an affair as a district school, it has everywhere been found absolutely
necessary to elect proper officers with authority to say what shall be done and how.
Without this, our schools would be in utter confusionwould be a failure. Take the
government of a city like Chicago.
Page 174
It would not be possible for it to exist without
a head, a mayor, or some chief officer. The order and peace of the city absolutely
demand this.
What would our nation do without a president, without some head? Were all men left
every one to do what was right in his own eyes, confusion and anarchy would soon be the
result. So generally is this fact felt that all nations without an exception,
appoint themselves some head, either a king, emperor, president, or the like. What
could we do in a war without a commander-in-chief, a general who should have absolute
command over all the army? If every soldier were allowed to go by himself, to fight
as he pleased and when he pleased, any army would soon be defeated.
Now if order, union, and government, are so very necessary in human affairs, why
not in the work of God? We believe that they are, and that the Lord has always
recognized this fact in every great work he has done on earth.
SOME WHOM GOD CHOSE
Was the world to be warned of the deluge? God chose a fit man to give that
warning, to prosecute the work. Evidently this was a greater work than it now
appears to us at this great distance of time. . . .
Take another familiar case, the exodus of the children of Israel from the land of
Egypt. This also required a leader peculiarly adapted to the circumstances. . . .
Just so again when the Jews were to be delivered from their Babylonish captivity,
and Jerusalem was to be rebuilt, some man must be raised up who had influence with the
Persian king, some one who had authority with the Jews. Ezra was the man qualified
for this great work, a strong, energetic, benevolent, large-minded man. . . .
So at the first advent, when a message was to be sent before the Messiah.
The Lord did not wait till the hour had arrived for the message to be given, and then
select a man at chance. The Lord does not do his work in this manner. His
plans were laid long beforehand. Gabriel was sent to Zechariah, even before John the
Baptist was begotten, to inform his father what kind of a son he would be, and how he
should be raised, what he should be named, &c. The Lord was not mistaken.
John fulfilled the prediction in every particular.
Who does not believe that it was by a special providence of God that Martin
Luther was raised up to do the mighty work which he did. . . .
What Adventist does not believe that father Miller was the special agent of God
to arouse the world upon the great question of the second advent, and give the first
angel's message. Rev. 14:6, 7. All who are familiar with his labors know that
he was just the man for the place. . . .
THERE MUST BE A LEADING
We do not argue that any of these chosen servants of God were faultless and
perfect in all their ways. In most cases it is very evident they were not. But
in every case it will be seen that some things were absolutely necessary to the successful
accomplishment of the work.
Page 175
1. There must be a leading mind in the work. But is not Christ the leader of
his people? Yes. And was not he the leader of his people in the days of Moses,
Nehemiah, Luther, Wesley, Miller, etc.? Yes. Did those men usurp the place of
Christ? No; and yet the Lord did place them in a leading position in his work on
earth. This is what we claim for this message and nothing more.
2. This person must be a man of more than ordinary capacity, not a man of
second or third rate ability. 3. He must be a man naturally constituted to be
independent and to lead in his work. 4. He must be specially adapted to the peculiar
work to be done. Hence as the nature of the Lord's work varies at different times,
so men differently constituted are chosen by the Lord. John the Baptist could
scarcely have filled the place of Moses or of Luther, neither could they have filled the
place of John the Baptist.
Review and Herald, March 15, 1887
APPLYING IT TO SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS
Now let us apply these facts and principles to our work. Admitting that the time
has come for the third angel's message to be given to the world, the question arises, Has
the Lord forgotten to attend to it? Is he not able to find proper men to do the
work? Or has this message actually begun, and has somebody been engaged in giving
it? Or we might ask, What is present truth? . . .
Do we not all agree that the second advent is near, and the world is now to be
warned concerning it? Do we not all agree that in the providence of God, special
light is now being given upon the subjects of the second advent near, the kingdom, the new
earth, the sleep of the dead, the destruction of the wicked, the doctrine of the trinity,
the law of God, God's holy Sabbath etc.? All Seventh-day Adventists will agree in
these things. The time has come that these truths must be preached to the world; and
the third angel's message of Rev. 14:9-12 is a prophecy of this work.
To come a little closer, we ask, If these truths are now being published to the
world, by whom are they heralded? . . .
We go back to the close of the first and second messages in 1844; in the
following year our good Father Bates began to keep the Sabbath and teach this in
connection with his Advent views. In a few months time Brother and Sister White also
received the Sabbath, and united its observance with the Advent doctrine. They very
soon received the light upon the subject of the Sanctuary, the sitting of the Judgment in
Heaven, and all those kindred truths which explain the disappointment in 1844. Here
they received light upon the third angel's message, and took the position there and then
that the time had now come for the third angel's message to be given, after the close of
the other two, and thus finish the last warning to the world.
Shortly, Eld. J. N. Andrews joined them in this work. So these brethren began to
preach this message to the world; but they were without means, without position, without
churches, without influence, and everything in the message was new, and it had to be
searched out and defended. Yet their
Page 176
faith in the message was then as strong as it
is now, and their confidence in its final triumph was expressed in very strong
terms. To all human appearance, they had no hope of success; but still they went to
work in the fear of God, studying, preaching, traveling, and meeting all kinds of
objections and opposition. Elder Bates wrote the first little book in favor of the
Sabbath, which was ever published by an Adventist Sabbath-keeper.
In 1849, Brother White, by a great exertion, published the first paper advocating
the third angel's message, the Sabbath, and the Advent united. Of course I have not
space to relate all the struggles, sacrifices, and arduous labor they put forth to advance
the work of this message. Suffice it to say, that all the Sabbath-keeping
Adventists, from the start, looked to Brother White as the leading mind in the work.
None were more hearty in this feeling than Father Bates.
THE WORK BEGINS TO MOVE
The first Conference ever held by Seventh-day Adventists was appointed and
attended by Bro. White, Elder Bates, Elder Andrews, and other faithful men, co-operating
with him, and Sister White also uniting her labors with his. They went everywhere,
exhorting the brethren, encouraging the churches, counseling the ministers, and pushing on
the work. They moved the paper from one place to another. While the REVIEW was
published at Rochester, N.Y., Brother Uriah Smith embraced the truth.
In 1855 Brother White moved the REVIEW office to Battle Creek, Michigan.
Here, by his advice, the first S. D. A. meeting house was built. To us now, it is
rather amusing to know that some zealous brethren opposed that as a move in the wrong
direction, as a denial of our Advent faith, as a long stride towards apostasy! But
what would our work have amounted to now, had that fanatical view carried?
From first to last, a good share of the trials which the brethren have had with
Brother White has been on such points as this. He has always been crying
"broader plans," while others have pulled back, and felt great alarm at such
moves. Time was too short, this was too much like the world and the nominal
churches, &c. And because their fanatical, narrow-minded views were not heeded,
they turned to fault-finding, and some of them have done nothing else for the last quarter
of a century.
[Elder Canright then discusses the development of church organization, the
publishing work, the medical work of the church, pointing out the foresight and leadership
of Elder James White.]
Review and Herald, April 12, 1877
OTHER STEPS IN ADVANCE
I believe I can truthfully say that there is not an institution among us, not an
organization, no advance step has been taken in this cause, but that which has been
accomplished through the counsel and earnest labors of Eld. White. Now that these
institutions, these organizations, have been established, and are in working order, we all
see the great importance and utility of them, and we thank God for them. We
would not know how to
Page 177
carry on the work without them. In the work of this message, to all
human appearance, if it had not been for the counsels, the enlarged plans, the earnest
labors of Eld. White, and the continual warning of the testimonies through Sister White, .
. . the third angel's message would not have accomplished to this day a hundredth part of
what it has.
We have all been inclined to have too narrow views, too small plans, and to neglect the
very means necessary to the prosecution of this work. . . .
ELLEN G. WHITE AND THE VISIONS
Thus far I have purposely omitted to say much about Sr. White and her visions and
their influence upon the cause. I will now briefly refer to them as this is a great
stone of stumbling with some.
Right here let me say that we do not throw away the Bible, and take Mrs. White's
visions instead. No; if there is a class of people under heaven who believe the
Bible strongly, who love it devotedly, who study it and go to it for everything, it is
Seventh-day Adventists. Here is our store-house of doctrine and truth. We
preach this everywhere and always. We have no other authority. We go to this
to test and prove the genuineness of Sr. White's labors and visions. If they did not
harmonize with this in every particular, we would reject them.
It is wicked for men to cry, "The Bible, the Bible, the Bible," and
profess to follow that implicitly when they reject one of the plainest doctrines of the
Bible,the doctrine of spiritual gifts. Of course I have not time here to take up
an argument on spiritual gifts, or enter into a lengthy statement of her labors, their
nature, &c. We believe, however, that no doctrine of the Bible is plainer than
that of the perpetuity of spiritual gifts, and particularly that these gifts are to be
restored in the last days. Joel 2:28-32; Rev. 12:17; 19:10; 1 Thess. 5:1-21; &c.
From the very start of this message, Sr. White has been intimately connected with
it. Ever since 1845, she has had her visions frequently, and they have had an
important bearing upon the work. Everywhere that Eld. White has gone preaching,
advising, planning, and directing in the work, she has gone, and stood side by side with
him.
She has always attended our large gatherings, our Conferences, and our
camp-meetings, preaching, exhorting, and bearing her testimony, and her influence has been
very great indeed. Not a move of any importance has ever been made in any department
of the work but she has spoken in the testimonies supporting it, either before or after it
was started, and as her testimonies have been generally believed and received by this
people, they have necessarily had a great influence upon the action of our people. I
am thoroughly satisfied that without the testimonies it would have been utterly impossible
to sustain many movements of great importance which have now proved a complete success in
this work. When the testimonies have spoken upon the subject, it has at once put an
end to strife and division of sentiments and complaints among our people, and they have
taken hold unitedly to prosecute the work.
Page 178
To the very same source we are largely indebted for the union in faith and
doctrine which prevails among us, and for our escape from the confusion, discord,
wrangling, and bickering, which everywhere characterize the other bodies of
Adventists. Shall we not thank God for such great benefits as these? Let
others think as they please, we are thankful for this inestimable blessing, and we are not
ashamed to say so.
THE INFLUENCE OF THE TESTIMONIES
The point which I wish to make is to call the attention of our brethren to the important
position and great influence which Sr. White and her testimonies have ever held in this
work. There are no half dozen men in our ranks who have really influenced the faith,
the practice, and the different important moves in this work so much as Sr. White and her
testimonies.
As long as this is an undeniable fact, let us look at the inevitable conclusion
which one must draw from it. Here is a special work to be done,a special message
to be given. The time has come for the Lord to move out a people to do the
work. We see this very work commenced, and carried forward successfully. We
look at the means which have been used to accomplish this work, and we find that from the
very beginning, chief and very prominent among them are the labors of Br. and Sr. White.
She had traveled everywhere, and given her influence to the work with all her
might as an able speaker. Many have been converted to this truth under her
personal efforts. Her voice has been heard in our Conferences, and in the counsels
of our people. Through her urgent appeals and strong entreaties, advance moves have
been made, instructions for the prosecution of the work have been founded, and in every
conceivable way her important labors for thirty years have been intimately connected with
this work, and have done very much for its success.
Now, while all this proves nothing to men who do not believe the Seventh-day
Adventist doctrine, or the third angel's message, yet to those who do believe these
doctrines, it seems to me that one conclusion is inevitable, viz., that Bro. and Sr. White
must be servants of God, and that her testimonies must be from the Lord.
Look at it a moment. Here are certain great truthsa definitely foretold
message, in the success of which we are all deeply interested. We believe that it is
not only truth, but the present truth. These truths have brought us from darkness to
light, from the fables of men to the commandments of God. They have made the Bible
to us a new book. In the belief and practice of them we have been greatly blessed by
the Lord. They are the joy and rejoicing of our souls. We believe they are
destined to test the world and prepare it for the harvest of the great day. We
rejoice in the prosperity of this work, in the spread of this truth.
Now consider: What means have been used by the Lord to bring out, to maintain,
and publish this work to the world? What agents did God use to bring these blessed
truths to our attention? First, foremost, and prominent among them all, as we have
shown, are the untiring, life-long labors of Br. and Sr. White. We appeal to
the common sense of every believer:
Page 179
How can you consistently believe the work to be of God and the workmen of the devil? It is utterly inconsistent.
Every man in his own soul does and must admit this. He may try to dodge and fight
it, and fix it up some other way, but it is of no use. We must either accept Bro.
and Sr. White as God's accredited servants, or we must reject the third angel's message;
and the facts show that this is just about what every one does. Those who commence
by finding fault with Bro. White, and by rejecting the testimonies, sooner or later end by
giving up the third angel's message, and finally separating themselves from this
people. This result is inevitable, and hence we warn our brethren before they start
upon that path just where it will lead to. There has been no exception in the past,
there will be none in the future.
Review and Herald, April 19, 1877
A PERSONAL TESTIMONY
As to the Christian character of Sr. White, I beg leave to say that I think I
know something about it. I have been acquainted with Sr. White for eighteen years,
more than half the history of our people. I have been in their family time and
again, sometimes weeks at a time. They have been in our house and family many
times. I have traveled with them almost everywhere; have been with them in private
and in public, in meeting and out of meeting, and have had the very best chances to know
something of the life, character, and spirit of Bro. and Sr. White.
As a minister, I have had to deal with all kinds of persons, and all kinds of
character, till I think I can judge something of what a person is, at least after years of
intimate acquaintance.
I know Sr. White to be an unassuming, modest, kind-hearted, noble woman.
These traits in her character are not simply put on and cultivated, but they spring
gracefully and easily from her natural disposition. She is not self-conceited,
self-righteous, and self-important, as fanatics always are.
I have frequently come in contact with fanatical persons, and I have always found
them to be full of pretentions [sic], full of pride, ready to give their opinion, boastful
of their holiness, etc. But I have ever found Sr. White the reverse of all
this. Any one, the poorest and the humblest, can go to her freely for advice and
comfort without being repulsed. She is ever looking after the needy, the destitute,
and the suffering, providing for them, and pleading their cause. I have never formed
an acquaintance with any persons who so constantly have the fear of God before them.
Nothing is undertaken without earnest prayer to God. She studies God's word
carefully and constantly.
I have heard Sr. White speak hundreds of times, have read all her testimonies
through and through, most of them many times, and I have never been able to find one
immoral sentence in the whole of them, or anything that is not strictly pure and
Christian; nothing that leads away from the Bible, or from Christ; but there I find the
most earnest appeals to obey God, to love Jesus, to believe the Scriptures, and to search
them constantly.
Page 180
I have received great spiritual benefit times without number, from the
testimonies. Indeed, I never read them without feeling reproved for my lack of faith
in God, lack of devotion, and lack of earnestness in saving souls. If I have any
judgment, any spiritual discernment, I pronounce the testimonies to be of the same Spirit
and of the same tenor as the Scriptures.
THE FRUITAGE
For thirty years these testimonies have been believed and read among our
people. How has it affected them? Has it led them away from the law of God?
Has it led them to give up faith in Christ? Has it led them to throw aside the
Bible? Has it led them to be a corrupt, immoral people? I know that they will
compare favorably with any other Christian denomination.
One thing I have remarked, and that is, that the most bitter opponents of the
visions of Sr. White admit that she is a Christian. How they can make this
admission is more than I know. They try to fix it up by saying that she is
deceived. They are not able to put their finger upon a single stain in all her life,
nor any immoral sentence in all her writings. They have to admit that much of her
writings are excellent, and that whoever would live out all she says would be a good
Christian, sure of Heaven. This is passing strange if she is a tool of the devil,
inspired by Satan, or if her writings are immoral or the vagaries of her own mind.
Another fact should have great weight with our Sabbath keeping Adventists.
All the leading men among us, those of the very strongest minds and the best talents, and
who have had every facility for more than a quarter of a century to become thoroughly
acquainted with Sr. White and her writings have the strongest faith in her
testimonies. This, with our people who kept the Sabbath and believe in the Advent
doctrine, should have great weight.
I could name half a dozen men whose writings you read with great delight, whose
talent and ability you all admire, whose piety and doctrine none of you question, who have
all confidence in her gift. By a long and intimate acquaintance with Sr. White and
her writings, they have had a hundred-fold better chance to decide upon this question than
ninety-nine out of a hundred lay brethren. They have seen Sr. White in vision, they
have heard her deliver hundreds of testimonies to individuals whom they know. Indeed, they
themselves have been reproved through them, and they have read and studied her writings
over and over thoroughly. They are conscientious, God-fearing men,men, too, who
are close Bible students. Do those persons doubt the testimonies? No, not one
of them.
We do not ask others to believe upon their faith; but we do say that others who
have not had the opportunity to investigate this question as these men have, should feel
some modesty in giving a different decision upon, or taking up opposition against, the
same question.
CONTRASTED WITH IMPOSTERS
Another fact I have noticed: Impostors are always anxious to build up themselves.
Any one who will support them they will flatter and praise and sustain;
Page 181
but I know it be
just the reverse in this case. Those who have been the most often, and, probably,
the most severely, reproved through the testimonies, are those who have been the warmest
supporters of Sr. White. This does not look like the policy of a deceiver.
But the special point which we wish our brethren to reconcile in their own minds
is this: How they can believe the third angel's message, how they can believe that this is
the special work of God, how they can believe that the time has come for these truths to
be given to the world, and that in the providence of God they are being given, and still
can believe that Sr. White is not the servant of God, and her testimonies are not from the
Lord.
Consider the fact that for over thirty years these testimonies have been
intimately connected with this work, that Sr. White has had a very prominent position in
the work, and that her testimonies have had a good deal to do in shaping this work, and in
sustaining and building it up,consider all these facts, and then reconcile this if you
can with the supposition that the work is of God and the workmen are of Satan! Would
God allow a deceiver, an impostor, to stand in so prominent a place in his work for so
long a time? If this be so, we fearlessly challenge any one to point to a single
example of a similar case in all the history of God's work upon earth.
Where did the Lord ever have a special work to be done for this church where a
corrupt man has taken hold in that work, and stood at its head all the way through?
The very idea is absurd. Do you find it so in the case of Noah? Of Moses? Of Elijah?
Of the forerunner of the first advent? Or at the time of the Reformation? In the work of
Wesley? Or of Wm. Miller? There is no case. God has never suffered it to be,
neither will he now. No, dear brethren, we must either renounce the third angel's
message, or accept those whom God has raised up to give it. And this naturally
brings me to consider another notable fact in our history.
Review and Herald, April 26, 1877
AN OBSERVATION
In all my acquaintance among the thousands of our people, and I have had a very
extensive acquaintance with them, I have always noticed that those who have rejected the
testimonies have largely lost their zeal in the cause, lost their faith in the work, their
piety and devotion, and have become cold, unfeeling, and dark in their minds. . . . I now
refer to those who have had a chance to become informed upon the question, and have taken
their stand against the visions.
Of course there are a good many who know but little or nothing about them, and
have taken no position one way or the other. I do not refer to them, but to those
who have taken a decided stand against them. I know whereof I affirm, and I have yet
to see one single exception.
Right in connection with this, I want to call your attention to that which has
had a powerful influence upon my mind touching this question; viz., the failure and ruin
which has every time overtaken those who have undertaken to hold on to the message and the
present truth and still oppose the testimonies. Ever since the work began, persons
have risen up here and
Page 182
there in opposition to the visions, or perhaps to the work of Bro.
White, and have taken their stand against them. They said that they believed the
Sabbath, the advent doctrine, the messages, indeed, all parts of present truth except the
testimonies. They claimed that the visions and the position of Br. White where a
hindrance to the cause, and a stumbling block in the way of its advancement; that if these
were removed, then the cause would progress finely. . . . They have generally begun by
protesting that they were in harmony with all the truth except those points named.
On several occasions not only individuals but even companies have started off on this
track. [At this point Gamaliel's counsel to the Sanhedrin is presented.]
He says, Let these men alone; if this work or counsel be of God, it will stand,
and you cannot overthrow it; but if it is of men, it will come to naught. Then he
proves this by citing two cases. . . .
Now, says Gamaliel, this is the way it will always be. If the work is not of God,
it will come to confusion; but if it is of God, all the powers of hell cannot arrest it.
Now apply this undoubted principle to the history of those who have drawn off
from the body of Seventh-day Adventists. I have known of them, and have been more or
less acquainted with their history from Maine to California. Six different papers
have been started in the interest of that rebellious work, and all except one, have gone
down.
Review and Herald, May 10, 1877
GOD'S PROSPERING HAND
But now in conclusion: The real point which I wish to make in the minds of our
brethren and sisters is this: If the third angel's message, including the Sabbath, the
second advent, the saints' inheritance, the nature of man, and these important points of
faith,if this work is of God, and the time has come that these truths are to be
preached, and yet if the visions of Sr. White and the position of Eld. White are not
correct, but are really displeasing to God, I ask you this one question: Why is it that
God does not prosper and build up these opposers who have gone off from us upon this very
issue?
Every time they have started out with simply leaving out the visions and opposing
the work of Bro. White. Why does not God help them, and show that they are right and
we are wrong? I maintain that the providence of God in the history of this work has
settled the question that we must either accept the testimonies, and Bro. and Sr. White as
God's servants, or give up the third angel's message entirely. We warn you who are
inclined to find fault and murmur and draw off. Be careful what path you are
entering upon. If you proceed in that direction, you will land just where all others
have who have tried it before you. . . .
Brethren, you who believe these testimonies, do you read them and follow them as
closely as you should? Do you love them and remember what they say? Do you try
to drink in their spirit? Do you have them in your houses? Do you refer to
them frequently? I know that nothing would be more profitable to you than these,
next to the Bible.
Review and Herald, June 14, 1887
Page 183
PART B
To Those in Doubting Castle
By Elder D. M. Canright
Among the most dangerous of the places which pilgrims had to pass in the days of
Bunyan was Doubting Castle. Many a poor pilgrim was caught on these grounds, shut up
in this terrible old castle, and finally destroyed by the keeper, Giant Despair. But some
were finally lucky enough to make their escape. That same old castle still stands by
the way, as grim, and dark, and dreadful as ever. Every now and then some poor
pilgrim, venturing too near, is caught. Some are rescued, but many are not.
Hoping to help some of these, and to warn others, I write these lines.
Twenty-five years ago I embraced this message. The complete system of truth
which it presented seemed to me something wonderful and very glorious. The study of
the Bible was a continual feast to me. To preach it to others, and see them embrace
it, filled my heart with gladness and peace. But at length things came up which
threw me into doubt on some points, and finally were the occasion of my ceasing to preach
the message. As the same things have affected others more or less, and will be
liable to affect still others in the future, I wish to give a few of the reasons why I
still think that the work is all right, that the Lord is in it, and that these doubts are not well founded.
EASY TO DOUBT
It is well for us to remember that it is always easier to doubt than to
believe. Jesus commanded his disciples to preach the gospel. Those who should
believe would be saved, but those who should not believe would be damned. He knew
full well that only a few would believe, and such has been the case. The great mass
of men from that day to this have rejected the gospel. They claim that the evidence
is not sufficient to prove that the message is from God. Could not God have given
more evidence, and clearer, to sustain the gospel had he thought best? He gave
enough so that every one who really hungers and thirsts after light, who is willing to
seek for it as for hid treasures, who is willing to humble his soul before God, and cry
earnestly to him for direction, can find it to the complete satisfaction of his soul.
Page 184
But even the gospel is not so plain that objections cannot be raised against it if men
try hard to find them. Well informed infidels even raise many objections
against the Bible itself,objections which are difficult to answer, and which they claim
never have been satisfactorily answered. And so they go on scoffing and
disbelieving. But Christians don't give up their faith for all that. The
evidence on the other hand is too clear and too abundant to be overbalanced by a few
seeming objections.
We must remember that there are always two sides to every question.
Whatever position may be taken on any question, some one can be found to dispute it and to
raise arguments against it. So generally has this been the case that the main tenet
of one sect of the old philosophers was that we could not know anything certainly, not
even our own existence. And yet for all that, common men go right on believing that
they know some things.
THE PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE
It is the accepted rule in all the affairs of this life to decide the questions, even
where life or death is at stake, by the balance, or preponderance, of evidence. The
existence of God, the inspiration of the Bible, the truth of Christianity etc., are
accepted and firmly believed upon these grounds. I firmly believe that the truth of
our message can be just as clearly proved in the same manner. It is by ignoring this
rule of evidence that men become skeptical concerning God, the Holy Scriptures, and all
religious faith. In just the same way some of our people come to be doubters
concerning our message, the testimonies, etc. They let a few light objections on one
side outweigh a mountain of truth on the other.
All the doubters and those troubled with unbelief have not been outside the
church. Even some of the real children of God all along the ages have been troubled
with unbelief. Jesus had to meet it in his disciples, till it saddened his
heart. Thus he said, "O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the
prophets have spoken." Luke 24:25. They had seen sufficient proof that Jesus
was the Messiah; but when some things transpired which they had not expected, and could
not understand, they let these outweigh the evidence which had been clear and satisfactory
to them before.
Thomas belonged to this class of doubters; but it did not seem to profit himself,
benefit the cause, or please his Master. All we ever hear of him is about his asking
questions. When all his brethren positively assured him that they had actually seen
Jesus, and had talked with him, Thomas refused to believe it. He must see for
himself, and put his finger into the wounds in Jesus' hands, before he would be
convinced. The Lord granted him the proof he demanded, and then said to him,
"Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have
not seen, and yet have believed." John 20:29. Thomas thought he could not help
his unbelief; for there were the stubborn facts, and what could he do with them? But
the Lord thought differently; and evidently his reproof of the doubting apostle was
designed also for all other of a like disposition in every age.
Page 185
RESPONSE TO EVIDENCE
We must remember that we may demand too much evidence,more than God sees best to
give. Take one case as an illustration; John the Baptist came with a solemn warning
from God. Jesus says that the Pharisees, in rejecting him, rejected the counsel of
God against themselves; but that the publicans and common people "justified God,
being baptized with the baptism of John." Luke 7:29, 30. How did these
justify God? Let us pass over to the Judgment. These Pharisees will be
surprised to find themselves rejected. They will plead that they were honest, that
they would have believed if John had only worked a miracle or had given sufficient
evidence of his mission.
But the simple people who did believe John will rise up, and say, "We lived
at the same time you did, and in the same town; we heard the same things that you heard,
and we believed. The evidence was sufficient for us." Thus they will
justify God, and condemn the unbelievers.
So will it be in every age. Those who have believed will rise up and
testify that the evidence was sufficient if the heart had only been humble enough to
submit to God's ways. Why is it that the word of God so often and so earnestly
insists upon humility of heart and contrition of soul as necessary to a right
understanding of his work? Let the boastful doubter think of this, and beware.
From the very beginning God's work has been doubted by some who have had a full
knowledge of it and a close connection with it. Thus Abel by faith offered unto God
an acceptable gift; but Cain's sacrifice was not accepted of God. For this Cain was
angry,angry with God and with his brother. He thought that Abel was a fool, and
God was unjust. From that day to this there have been the same two classes,the
believing Abels and the doubting Cains. By faith Noah condemned the world.
Heb. 11:7. He had the same evidence which the world had. He believed, they
disbelieved. He was right, they were wrong.
ISRAEL'S EXPERIENCE
No man ever came from God with better evidences of his divine mission than Moses;
and yet right among his own people and followers and co-workers doubters were constantly
springing up. It now seems to us that one or two clearly wrought miracles would forever
settle our doubts as to the divine mission of the person working them. But look at
this case. Consider the wonderful miracles which the people saw Moses perform,the
river turned to blood, all the plagues in Egypt, the pillar of cloud constantly attending
them day and night, the sea opened, etc. How strong their faith was then! How
confident their song after their triumph at the Red Sea!
But they start on, and for several days in a hot climate there is not a drop of water
for man or beast. Soon they begin to murmur, then to question, and finally to doubt
whether the Lord was leading them. Doubtless they reasoned, "Didn't God know we
must have water? If he were leading, would he have made such a terrible
blunder?" "Is the Lord among us, or not?" (Ex.17:7)
Page 186
was the all-absorbing question of debate in tents, by the
camp-fires, and in little groups of earnest talkers. What about all the miracles
they had witnessed, the faith they had expressed but a few days before? These were
not quite as weighty and conclusive now as they had thought them to be.
The same spirit of fault-finding and of doubt was continually cropping out during
the whole forty years. Yet at the same time there was the pillar of cloud always
with them, the manna falling day after day for forty years, besides many other miracles.
In the face of all this, a few objections which they could not, or would not, understand
outweighed everything else.
Look at the remarkable occurrences related in Num. 16. Over two hundred and
fifty leading men headed a rebellion against Moses. They said, "Moses, you
promised to lead us right into a land flowing with milk and honey, and to give us
possession; but you have done no such thing. Here you have led us round and round
for twenty years. We are no nearer the promised land than when we started. Our
brethren have died of hunger and thirst, and we are nearly worn out. You cannot
deceive us any longer. We are going back to Egypt. Our mission is a
failure."(See verses 12-14.) They thought they had a clear case.
But Moses proposed to appeal to God to decide who was right. They readily
accepted his proposition, and boldly went out with their censers, and stood before God for
him to answer. This showed that they were in earnest, and thoroughly believed that
they were right. But when God did answer, they all went down into the earth in a
moment, and perished. Just so now: fault-finders and doubters become so confident in
their positions that they are willing to go up to God and to the Judgment with it.
Take care! Korah and his sympathizers did that, and did it to their eternal ruin.
But what is more astonishing still, is that "on the morrow all the
congregation of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and against Aaron, saying,
"Ye have killed the people of the Lord." Ver. 41. Was not that astonishing
after all they had witnessed the day before? But such is the power of unbelief when
once fortified in the heart. This should teach us great caution in rejecting
manifest light and truth because of some seeming difficulties and objections connected
with it.
ELIJAH, JOHN, AND THE DISCIPLES
The faith of even the best men has sometimes wavered when hard pressed.
Elijah had a special work to do in reforming Israel in the days of Ahab. God wrought
through him mightily. The priests of Baal were slain, and a great victory
gained. Elijah was exultant. He thought that the king and queen and all the
people were coming over to the Lord. But when it did not turn out so, and the queen
threatened to kill him, he ran for his life, and went into the wilderness, and lay down
requesting to die. 1 Kings 19:1-4. He thought his mission was a failure.
And even when the Lord said to him, "What doest thou here, Elijah?" (ver.9) He
was ready to argue his case, and defend his course, till the Lord convinced him that he
was wrong.
So also even John the Baptist, after being left in prison for a long time, and
being threatened with death, became shaken in his faith in Jesus.
Page 187
If Jesus was the Messiah, why did he leave him there to perish? He sends two of his disciples to
inquire if after all he is really the Messiah? Luke 7:19. What a sad exhibition of
human weakness this was after his strong faith in Jesus when he cried, "Behold the
Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world!" John 1:29. When
such men as these falter and doubt for a moment, no wonder that weaker ones yield to
temptations, and apostatize entirely when trials and discouragements come upon the
cause. So it always has been, and so it always will be.
Even Christ's disciples went through the same process of doubting and sifting and
apostatizing; and that, too, after they had seen many and wonderful miracles wrought by
him. When Jesus performed the miracle of feeding the multitude with a few loaves and
fishes, they were so moved that they proposed to take him by force and make him a
king. John 6:9-15. The next day when Jesus rebuked them for seeking the things
of this world, their faith suddenly cooled off, and they demanded of him another miracle
that they might believe. Ver. 30. And when he rebuked them still more sharply,
they said, "This is an hard saying: who can hear it?" Ver. 60.
"From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with
him." Ver. 66.
We see them turning away with a sneer. They have been deceived and misled;
but now their eyes are open, and they will be fooled no longer. Such is unbelief,
such it always has been, and such it always will be. Luther's work developed
hundreds of these doubters,men who were at first warm believers. Wesley found the
same class. If God's work now does not develop them, it will be a new thing under
the sun.
GOD DOES NOT REMOVE OCCASION FOR DOUBT
The fact is that God has never at any time given so much light and evidence that
man had to believe whether he wanted to or not. Nor has he been careful to remove
all objections out of the way of those who have believed and embraced his truth. In
fact, he has evidently placed objections right in their way on purpose to test their faith
and try their devotion to him. This is just what Moses said God did do to the
Israelites. Deut. 8:1-3. It is just what he has always done, and always will do.
The gift of an immortal life in glory, purchased at the infinite price of the
death of God's own Son, is too precious a boon to be lightly bestowed. God is
willing, nay, anxious, that all men should have it; but they must first show their
appreciation of it by carefully, humbly, earnestly, and prayerfully seeking after
it. It must be to them like the hid treasures and the pearl of great price for which
they are willing to give all. Such seekers do not miss the truth. A few
obstacles or difficulties do not turn them back.
But when men become proud and self-sufficient, then the Lord leaves them to be
filled with their own ways. Behold the haughty Herod demanding proof of Christ that
he was the Son of God! How much did Jesus give him? He answered him not one
word. He had not a ray of light for him. But now see our Lord at the well in
Samaria. To that humble woman he opens his whole soul, and tells her plainly that he
is the Messiah.
Page 188
He purposely left the proud Pharisees to draw a wrong conclusion
from his declaration that he could build the temple in three days, while he carefully
explained all his parables to the humble fishermen.
Notice what God says of Christ: "Behold, I lay in Zion a stumbling-stone and rock
of offense." Rom. 9:23. Didn't God know that man would stumble over
him? Yes; and so he knows that they will also stumble over other truths just
as they always have done, and always will do. But those who seek God humbly and with
tears will not be left to fall. God would send every angel from heaven before one
such should miss the way. All these facts apply with equal force to the cause of God in
our day, to the third angel' message, and to all connected with it.
ELLEN G. WHITE AND THE TESTIMONIES
But I wish more especially to apply this to the testimonies. What evidence
do we have that they are of God? Every argument in favor of the third angel's
message is an argument in favor of the testimonies. Why? If it be a fact that the
time has come for a special warning to the world on the advent near, the law of God, and
other truths which we hold, then we may be sure that God would prepare the way for that
message by raising up proper persons to give it.
God by his providence raised up Moses to lead his people out of Egypt. Before
Jeremiah was born, God had set him apart to do the work before him. Jer. 1:5.
So of John the Baptist. Before his birth the angel announced his mission. Luke
1. Who does not believe that Luther was a man of God's providence, raised up to do
that special work? So of Wesley. Shall, then, the last closing message to the world
fall due and God provide no fit instruments to proclaim it, and push it through to the
end? That is absurd, and contrary to all God's doings in the past, as we have
already seen.
Now, admitting that ours is a special message from God designed to warn this
generation, look at its history. Sr. White and her work have not only been connected with
the message from the very first, but she has had a leading influence in that work, has
stood front and foremost, and with voice and pen has done more to guide and mold the
message than any other half dozen laborers now in the cause. From the beginning her
teachings have been accepted by all the leading ministers and believers as light from God.
Now would it not be the very height of absurdity to accept the message and the
work as the truth and God's work, and yet reject the very one who had done the work?
A deceiver, an impostor, a false teacher stand at the head of God's special work for forty
years! No, that will never do. We must either reject the message or receive
the testimonies. They stand or fall together. So I repeat that every argument
in favor of the main doctrine of our faith is an argument in favor of the testimonies.
Another argument in favor of the testimonies is the fact that all those parties
who have drawn off from our people in opposition to the testimonies have come to naught,
or at best have had only a feeble existence.
Page 189
Time and again this has been
tried by different persons proposing to preach all the message except the
testimonies. Now if that position is right, why don't [sic] God prosper them? Why
don't they succeed better than those who hold and teach them?
OTHER EVIDENCE
Another evidence in favor of the testimonies is the fact that those who have
accepted them have always stood together, and have perfectly agreed in faith and practice;
while those who have opposed them have disagreed in doctrine and discipline, and have
split up into little factions.
And still another evidence is found in the fact that those who remain among us,
and still oppose the testimonies, soon lose their love for the message, their
spirituality, their devotion, their zeal for God and for the salvation of souls. I
have seen many such cases, and have never yet known an exception to this rule. Why
is this so? If they are right, why does it always have this effect? On the
other hand, the most devoted and zealous members in all our churches are those who have
the strongest faith in the testimonies.
Again, the tendency and influence of the testimonies is not, like the teachings
of Spiritualist mediums, to lead away from the Bible, away from God, and away from faith
in Christ; nor, like Mormonism, to lead to sensuality, dishonesty, and crime; but they
lead to faith in the Holy Scriptures, devotion to God, and a life of humility and
holiness. Can a corrupt tree bear good fruit? Jesus said not. What is a
tree known by?Its fruit. Here is a tree which has been standing among us for forty
years, and bearing fruit. What has been the nature of that fruit? What have
been its effects upon those who have partaken the most of it?
It seems to me now that no one who has ever felt the power of the Spirit of God
upon his own heart can candidly read through the four volumes of "Spirit of
Prophecy" without being deeply convicted that the writer must live very near to God,
and be thoroughly imbued with the same Spirit that inspired the Bible, and animated the
apostles and prophets. Such lofty thoughts of God, of heaven, and of spiritual
things cannot come from a carnal heart, nor from a mind deceived and led by Satan.
DIFFICULTIES NO OCCASION FOR REJECTION
But are there not difficulties in these writings hard to explain? Passages which
seem to conflict one with another, or with some passage in the Bible, or with facts?
I freely grant for myself that there are some passages which bother me, and which I do not
know how to explain. But I believe them for all that just as I do the Bible.
There are many passages in the Bible which I should have to admit I could not explain nor
harmonize. If any man says that he can explain and reconcile all the statements of
the Scriptures, he simply shows his self-conceit and ignorance. Yet I profoundly
believe the Bible for all that.
I have not a shadow of a doubt about the sleep of the dead, the annihilation of
the wicked, the Sonship of Christ, baptism by immersion, etc.; and yet there are
scriptures such for instance, as the rich man and Lazarus,
Page 190
which are as difficult
for me to harmonize with these plain Bible doctrines as it is for me to explain the
hardest passage in Sr. White's writings. Peter admitted that there were some things
in the Scriptures hard to be understood. 2 Pet. 3:16. He says that some wrest
the Scriptures to their own destruction. And that is just what some are doing with
the testimonies.
When we consider how extensive these writings are, extending over a period of
nearly forty years, embracing ten bound volumes besides many smaller works, it would be a
wonder indeed if in all these there should not be anything in the wording, the sentiment,
or the doctrine hard to understand and explain, or on which a sharp opponent could not
make a plausible argument. We know that God's revelations in the past have not been
given free from all obscurity and difficulties. Neither will they be now.
If a man reads the Bible on purpose to find objections, as Tom Paine did, and as
Ingersoll does, he will find plenty of them to satisfy his unbelief, and confirm him in
his infidelity. But if, like thousands of others equally learned and intelligent, he
goes to the Scriptures to find light and God and salvation, he will find them full and
clear, to the joy of his soul. I am profoundly convinced in the depths of my soul,
after an experience of twenty-five years, that the same thing is true of the testimonies.
AN EARNEST PERSONAL APPEAL
And now I want to reason awhile with those among us who are holding off and
living in doubt about the testimonies. I believe that your course is not only wrong,
but that it is unsatisfactory to you here, and will be unsatisfactory at the
Judgment. You take very little interest in the progress of the cause, you carry a
very light burden in the work of the church, you take but little part, if any, in the
Sabbath-school, you do next to nothing in the missionary work, you pay no tithes, you give
nothing anywhere, you have no burden for the salvation of souls, or if you have you never
show it; if you say anything at all it is mostly in raising queries and objections.
My brethren, my sisters, are you willing to let your short life slip by year
after year, and finally come up to the searching test of the Judgment in this way?
Beware! Many will land in perdition who do not intend to. Shut your eyes to it
as you may, such a course must inevitably end in disaster.
But you say, "I would like to believe and have full confidence in the whole
work if I only could; but I am afraid I shall believe an error." Well, let us
see if there is really any danger in going this way.
You certainly know that our people hold all the cardinal doctrines of
salvation,faith in God, the Bible, Jesus Christ, repentance, a holy life, etc.
Isn't this safe? You know that Sr. White and all our ministers not only so teach,
but exert all their influence to have our people live lives of devotion, of honesty, of
purity, of love, of plainness, of sacrifice, and of every Christian virtue. You know
that every sin is condemned among our people, and the most solemn warnings are constantly
given against even the appearance of evil. You know that in almost every church of
our people there are at least some who are living blameless Christian lives. You
know that there is not one immoral doctrine taught or practiced by our people.
Bad men and poor
Page 191
examples there are, to be sure; but they are such in spite of all our
efforts to make them better. You know that if any man will strictly live up to the
teachings of the testimonies and our people, he will certainly be saved.
Now will it not be better for you,better in this life and safer in the
next,to believe and labor heartily with this people than it is to believe with nobody,
be in harmony with no church, and have no settled system of doctrine? Of all the
miserable, unsatisfactory places to be in, that is the worst. There is no comfort in
it, there is no strength in it, there is no usefulness in it. Better to believe something,
better to run in somewhere, rather than to stand out there in the storm all alone. A
hut, a hovel, is better than that. What a pitiable condition a man must be in at
this day when there are so many churches and kinds of doctrine, who can neither believe
nor work with any of them! Such a person must be badly befogged some way.
My friend, is this your condition? How long have you been there? One
year? Five years? Ten years? Haven't you settled it yet? Then give it up, and
come in with those who have settled it, where there is faith and hope and zeal and active
work for God and man.
Look at the grand truths which our people hold,the new earth, the beautiful
city, the resurrection, the real life hereafter, the literal coming of Christ, the sleep
of the dead, the destruction of sin and sinners, the law of God, all those grand lines of
prophecy unmistakably pointing to the end near. Can you give these all up, forget
them, and shut them from your heart? Can you once more have confidence in intangible
spirits, eternal hell, sprinkling for baptism, Sunday-Sabbath, or the millennium?
Pshaw! Strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel!
I find that there is peace and joy, hope and confidence, love for souls, and the
blessing of God in giving full confidence to the whole message; and these I have never
found in doubting it, nor have I ever seen any one who did find them that way. All
admit that we have truth enough, if lived out, to save us. We know that all other
churches have many errors. How shall we gain anything, then, by going there? Start a
new church of our own? Well, the success of those who have left us and tried that
has not been very encouraging.
No, the real trouble lies close at home, in a proud, unconverted heart, a lack of
real humility, an unwillingness to submit to God's way of finding the truth.
Review and Herald, Feb. 10, 1885
|